Ocena teme:
  • 0 Glas(ov) - 0 Povprečje
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Strelski incident izgovor za zaostritev zakonodaje?
Predvsem bi radi 'prodal' ,da so nekaj naredl.

V ZDA bo zdaj na tapeti Safe Hearing act , ki bi sprostil dušilce zvoka tako ,da ne bi bilo ve potrebno plačevati po 250$ za dovoljenje saj bi jih prekfalificiral iz neke XY nevarne kategorije v opremo za zaščito sluha. Za ta namen so bili razviti in šele potem montirani tudi na vse ostalo mašinerijo kjer plini ustvarjajo hrup

Pred očmi bo pa taka slika češ koliko bi šele bilo mrtvh če ne bi slišal pokov orožja. LOL po videu sodeč ni bilo nič reakcije na poke dokler ni bilo dosti ranjenih.




Ko so te lonce omejil so bili krivi makaronarji in zamorci ,ki so preveč jagal za v lonec
Citat:Hornaday, one problem was that modern guns were too accurate. Also, hunters now had better scopes and binoculars. In Wyoming, hunters were using silencers so one shot didn’t frighten away other game.
Even worse, in Hornaday’s view, was who was hunting. Namely, lower-class Americans and immigrants. He urged new laws to “prohibit the use of firearms by any naturalized alien from southern Europe until after a 10-years’ residence in America.” Wildlife was vanishing because “the Italians are spreading, spreading, spreading. If you are without them to-day, to-morrow they will be around you. Meet them at the threshold with drastic laws, thoroughly enforced.”

In the South, Hornaday argued, the problem was hunting by “poor white trash” and blacks. In an earlier time, black Americans “were too poor to own guns.” But “the time came when . . . single-shot breech-loading guns went down to five dollars a piece. The negro had money now, and the merchants . . . sold him the guns, a gun for every black idler, man and boy, in all the South.”
Odgovori


Prispevkov v tej temi
RE: Strelski incident izgovor za zaostritev zakonodaje? - od mr.T - 04-10-2017, 18:02



Uporabnikov, ki berejo to temo: 1 Gost(ov)